Union's Position: not to Challenge the Vaccination Mandate from the Outset.
Who and How made this decision ?

Since Fall 2021, I have learned, through my professional and social networks, about the disturbing lack of support from the Union for workers whose fundamental human rights for religious expression, life security (bodily autonomy), equality before the law,  have been heavily breached by the Employer when it imposed vaccination mandates. 

Instead of supporting the members in their rightful desires to file grievances, Employment Relationship Officer (LRO)  seemed to actively discourage them to do so . They justified their “do not recommend for the Institute to represent you” decision  as being “not in line with the Institute's position” or (in case of religious exemption denial) because the Institute used the narrow  definition of religion, which does not include multitude of spiritual practices that are not connected to churches or religious leaders.

The very fact that the Institute's position in support of mandates, which was published on 15 October 2021, has still not been updated   - despite the new scientific data (e.g., no proof of stopping transmission for covid vaccine) and legal decision that showed these mandates were unreasonable (at minimum for employees who worked remotely, of which there were many in Public Service)  is very unsettling. Thousands of members were traumatized by these mandates  (many still have not recovered - either from vaccine damage or financial and psychological stress) by such “unreasonable” actions of the employer, and the Union does not appear to be willing to publicize and prioritize this issue. This issue is not even listed among the topics in its News & Issues  page !

This issue has become yet another reason why I decided to get involved in Union matters,  with all my data and networking skills - to speak up for all those vulnerable members, who suffered from Vaccine mandates, who could not speak for themselves, who have been discriminated and ostracized by their employer and who, on top all of that,  were also denied support from the Union.  If you one of those members, you can contact me directly. I will do my best to help you.

It is time for the Union to update The Statement based on political-interference-free evidence!

It is also time to provide full transparency and accountability for all Union's actions related to issuing The Statement and denying support* for the members traumatized by The Policy!

Related actions: 

• • Highlights from BoD meetings related to Mandates (subtack)

  • Letter to BoD - Investigating why PIPSC decided to NOT file file grievances  for remotely working members" (Page created, Substack)